The Viability Crisis: Funding and Consolidation for Small Utilities (2026)
- Small utilities must address a severe viability crisis caused by aging infrastructure and capitalization deficits; securing external federal funding is mandatory for long-term sustainability.
- Access federal capital by targeting the EPA (DWSRF/CWSRF) for compliance projects and the USDA Rural Development programs for blended loans and grants specifically designed for rural systems.
- When independent operation is unsustainable, utilities must pursue strategic consolidation (mergers, shared services, or contract operations) to achieve economies of scale and improve technical capacity.
- To justify investment and prioritize projects, utilities must immediately implement GIS asset management and advanced technology (like leak detection) to quantify deferred maintenance and strengthen funding applications.
Table of Contents
- I. Operational and Financial Challenges Facing Small Systems
- II. Navigating Federal Funding Opportunities for Water Projects
- III. Strategic Consolidation and Partnership Pathways
- IV. Leveraging GIS and Advanced Technology for Asset Management
- V. Federal Programs Targeting Specific Regions and Needs
- Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Federal Funding and Strategic Consolidation
Small U.S. water systems, defined as those serving fewer than 10,000 customers, face critical challenges in maintaining compliance, securing capitalization, and ensuring long-term sustainability. Approximately 92% of all public water systems fall into this classification.
The viability crisis is driven by aging infrastructure and increasingly complex regulatory requirements. Deferred maintenance of essential drinking water infrastructure and wastewater infrastructure threatens public health and economic development in these service areas.
This resource provides utility managers and Boards of Directors with a precise, instructional framework. The focus is on securing federal funding and evaluating strategic consolidation options within the current fiscal environment.
Securing federal funding is mandatory for addressing these infrastructure projects. Key implementation partners include the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Department of the Interior through the Bureau of Reclamation.
Understanding the application mechanisms for federal programs, including those administered by Congress and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, is the first step toward sustained operational capacity.
I. Operational and Financial Challenges Facing Small Systems
Small water utilities operate under constraints defined by a limited rate base and escalating operational costs. This combination creates a significant viability deficit.
Aging water infrastructure and complex regulatory burdens directly impact the ability to maintain essential public health standards and guarantee a reliable water supply.
A. Regulatory Compliance and Technical Capacity
Compliance with Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) standards necessitates specialized monitoring, treatment, and detailed reporting protocols.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforces stringent requirements, often mandating costly infrastructure projects regardless of the system’s customer base.
Small systems frequently lack the dedicated technical expertise or financial capacity required to implement solutions for emerging contaminants or complex treatment processes.
Key compliance hurdles that require immediate attention include:
- Maintaining appropriate operator certification levels and addressing staff turnover.
- Financing mandated capital improvements for new treatment technologies related to drinking water.
- Developing comprehensive asset management plans for existing drinking water infrastructure.
B. Capitalization Deficits and Rate Structure Limitations
The central financial challenge is the critical gap between operating revenue and the necessary capital replacement costs for water supply infrastructure.
Many small systems fail to implement full-cost recovery rate structures. This approach prioritizes short-term affordability but guarantees deferred maintenance and accelerated deterioration of water infrastructure.
Infrastructure projects cannot be funded solely through user fees. Utility managers must leverage external federal funding programs to close the capitalization deficit.
Securing long-term viability requires establishing full-cost recovery rates while simultaneously maximizing access to external low-interest federal programs. Failure to secure this funding guarantees reliance on expensive, reactive repairs.
Accessing resources from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is mandatory for sustainable drinking water infrastructure and wastewater infrastructure improvements.
Understanding the role of Congress in authorizing these federal programs is key to proactive planning and achieving economic development goals.
Related Video
How Do Your Water Rates Compare? Introducing the Missouri …
Tune in for a no-cost, 60-minute, interactive webinar to learn about the Missouri Regulated Water Rates Dashboard, as well as information …
Watch Video on YouTube →
II. Navigating Federal Funding Opportunities for Water Projects
Accessing federal funding requires a precise understanding of program mandates, agency jurisdiction, and application cycles. The federal government, authorized by Congress, provides substantial financial support for water projects. This includes critical investment in both drinking water infrastructure and wastewater infrastructure.
Small utility managers must identify which federal programs align with their system size and geographic location to maximize the potential for securing capital.
A. Standing Authorization Programs: EPA and USDA
Standing authorization programs offer continuous assistance for infrastructure projects. These are typically administered through state agencies or directly by federal entities. Small utility Boards must immediately engage state contacts to align proposed infrastructure projects with current state priorities for community development.
1. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) State Revolving Funds (SRFs)
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) manages two key programs: the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) and the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF). These funds utilize Capitalization Grants to offer low-interest loans, grants, and principal forgiveness. Priority is given to Small and Disadvantaged Communities.
Follow these instructional steps:
- DWSRF Compliance: Prioritize projects that mitigate immediate public health risks and ensure compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).
- Review IUP: Obtain and meticulously review your state’s Intended Use Plan (IUP) for Fiscal Year 2026. This document defines project eligibility and priority ranking criteria.
- Consult State SRF: Schedule consultation with the state SRF manager to confirm alignment of your proposed drinking water infrastructure project with state funding cycles.
2. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development agency manages critical Water and Environmental Programs. These federal programs are vital for utilities serving populations below 10,000. The USDA often employs blended financing (loans and grants) to fund capital-intensive water infrastructure and wastewater infrastructure upgrades.
Follow these steps for eligibility and application:
- Verify that your service area meets the USDA definition of a rural area (typically outside cities exceeding 10,000 inhabitants).
- Access the USDA‘s regional technical assistance resources for guidance on application packaging and securing funding information.
- Structure applications to demonstrably improve system reliability, support economic development, and achieve regulatory compliance.
B. Specialized Federal Financing Mechanisms
When water supply infrastructure projects exceed the capacity limits of traditional SRF funding, specialized federal programs must be utilized. These mechanisms target regionally significant developments and large-scale infrastructure projects.
1. Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program (WIFIA)
The Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program (WIFIA) offers long-term, low-cost federal credit assistance. While primarily serving large entities, small utilities can access WIFIA funding by submitting joint applications or by leveraging state-administered WIFIA programs for their water infrastructure needs.
WIFIA financing is highly effective for projects requiring multi-year financial planning.
2. Direct Project Authorizations: DOI and Army Corps
Large-scale water supply infrastructure projects require Direct Project Authorizations from Congress. These projects fall under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior (DOI) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
- Bureau of Reclamation: This division of the Department of the Interior focuses on water resource development and Municipal and Industrial Water Supply primarily across the 17 Western States. Utilities in this region must monitor annual appropriations for Bureau of Reclamation projects.
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE): The US Army Corps of Engineers requires specific legislative action from Congress for new civil works. Small utilities should seek partnerships with regional sponsors to qualify for USACE authorized projects related to water supply and flood risk mitigation.
Managers must review and compare all available federal programs. The table below summarizes the key federal funding sources applicable to small utility infrastructure projects in 2026:
| Program/Agency | Primary Focus Area | Funding Mechanism | Target Audience/Geographic Scope |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPA DWSRF | Drinking Water, Public Health Compliance | Low-interest Loans, Principal Forgiveness | All systems, prioritizing Small and Disadvantaged Communities |
| USDA Rural Development | Water/Wastewater Infrastructure | Loans and Grants (Blended Financing) | Rural areas (populations up to 10,000) |
| EPA CWSRF | Wastewater Infrastructure, Non-point Source Pollution | Low-interest Loans, State Administration | All systems and eligible non-point source projects |
| WIFIA Program | Large-scale Water Infrastructure Projects | Federal Credit Assistance (Long-term Loans) | Regionally significant projects, often through state intermediaries |
Related Video
Towns are offered high-tech help with water-quality projects
… water infrastructure projects. But how can small municipalities compete for the millions of dollars in federal infrastructure funding?
Watch Video on YouTube →
III. Strategic Consolidation and Partnership Pathways
When independent operation results in unsustainable financial burdens or persistent non-compliance, consolidation or regional partnership becomes mandatory. Consolidation is a proven strategy to achieve economies of scale, enhance technical capacity, and support long-term economic development and system viability.
A. Evaluating Financial and Operational Benefits
Consolidation shifts the utility from a high-risk, high-cost operational model to one where administrative, technical, and capital expenditures are shared. This immediately improves access to capital required for major water infrastructure and drinking water infrastructure upgrades.
Execute a formal feasibility study addressing these core components:
- Technical Assessment: Determine the physical condition of all assets. Utilize Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping to establish asset inventory, identify critical failure points, and accurately estimate replacement costs for water supply assets.
- Financial Analysis: Project the impact on ratepayer costs. Calculate potential savings derived from centralized purchasing, billing, and management. Demonstrate how shared costs improve eligibility for specific federal funding programs.
- Regulatory Viability: Confirm the required pathways for transfer of ownership or operational control. Ensure compliance with state Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines and public utility commissions.
B. Implementation Models for Regionalization
Full consolidation is not the only pathway. Implement one of the following models to achieve shared services while retaining necessary local jurisdiction.
1. Interlocal Agreements for Shared Services
Formalize an agreement between two or more independent utilities to share specific functions. Examples include centralized laboratory testing, maintenance crews, or back-office administration.
Define the scope of work precisely. Focus initially on non-revenue generating activities, such as GIS asset mapping or emergency response coordination. This approach minimizes immediate disruption.
2. Contract Operations and Management (O&M)
Retain ownership of system assets. Contract the daily operational management to a specialized regional entity or private firm. This immediately transfers the burden of technical compliance, operator staffing, and reporting to the Environmental Protection Agency.
3. Full Consolidation (Merger)
The small system is absorbed entirely by a larger regional utility. This pathway delivers the most substantial benefits regarding economies of scale and access to major capital for infrastructure projects.
This model is often required when the system faces chronic non-compliance issues impacting public health, making immediate access to capital for drinking water improvements critical.
C. Strategic Communication for Consolidation Success
Proactive communication ensures successful transition. Address the Board of Directors and the community directly to manage expectations.
Emphasize the long-term benefits to public health, financial stability, and reliable water supply. Frame the action as securing the future of the community development, rather than focusing on the loss of local control.
Use clear data from the financial analysis to demonstrate how shared costs improve fiscal responsibility and increase access to federal programs administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) or other federal entities.
Expert Insight
“In contrast to the expectation of cost savings, our analysis indicates that administrative consolidation of water utilities frequently does not lead to a significant unit cost decrease, and one-off costs during the transition can even cause overall cost increases.” , Michael Klien & David Michaud (Researchers, 2019)
IV. Leveraging GIS and Advanced Technology for Asset Management
Achieving long-term viability requires small utilities to move beyond paper records and adopt modern technological solutions. Accurate spatial data is essential for maximizing the efficiency of limited resources and justifying necessary investment in water infrastructure.
A. Implementing GIS for Infrastructure Mapping
A comprehensive Geographic Information System (GIS) platform is mandatory for effective asset management. This system provides the spatial analysis capabilities required to map critical assets and maintenance history.
Utilize this analysis to prioritize capital improvements and strengthen applications for federal funding programs targeting infrastructure projects.
Implement GIS asset mapping following these steps:
- Digitize all historical infrastructure blueprints and maintenance records immediately.
- Assign unique, standardized identifiers to all physical assets, including valves, hydrants, pumps, and treatment units.
- Geospatially map all assets, aligning them with parcel data and service connections.
- Integrate computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) or work order tracking data directly into the GIS interface.
- Use spatial querying to visualize areas of high failure rates, guiding targeted water infrastructure projects.
B. Predictive Maintenance and Leak Detection
Shift operations from reactive repair to predictive maintenance using advanced technology. Deploy smart metering and real-time supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems.
This strategy directly reduces non-revenue water (NRW) loss, securing the long-term water supply and lowering energy costs associated with drinking water treatment. Non-revenue water audits are crucial for demonstrating system efficiency to the federal government.
C. Utilizing Federal Programs for Technology Adoption
Federal agencies offer targeted funding for small system technology upgrades. You must align your technology procurement plan with available federal programs to access required capital.
Prioritize applications for community assistance and technical training funds administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development programs.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also manages specific grant programs under the Safe Drinking Water Act aimed at small and disadvantaged communities.
These federal funding programs recognize that investment in technology, such as Automated Meter Infrastructure (AMI) and advanced leak detection, is critical for maintaining public health and ensuring the viability of local drinking water infrastructure.
Consult the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program details for potential low-interest loans applicable to large-scale technology integration when regional partnerships are formed.
Coordinate with state revolving fund (SRF) administrators to identify set-asides specifically earmarked for technology and training related to wastewater infrastructure and drinking water system improvements.
Expert Insight
“Federal funding programs recognize that investment in technology, such as Automated Meter Infrastructure and advanced leak detection, is critical for maintaining public health and ensuring the viability of local drinking water infrastructure.” , Water Infrastructure Policy Analyst
V. Federal Programs Targeting Specific Regions and Needs
Beyond the core State Revolving Funds (SRFs) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) programs, small utilities must investigate targeted federal funding streams. These specialized federal programs address unique regional needs or specific infrastructure projects requiring direct Congressional authorization.
The federal government administers these funds through multiple agencies, including the Department of Commerce’s Economic Development Administration (EDA), the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and the Department of the Interior (DOI).
The Department of the Interior (DOI), particularly through the Bureau of Reclamation, manages substantial funding for large-scale water supply infrastructure and wastewater infrastructure projects, primarily in the Western U.S. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers also executes specific water projects authorized by Congress that include municipal and industrial drinking water supply components.
A. Identifying Niche Authorization Funding
Utility managers must monitor niche programs and annual appropriations that target specific demographic or geographic areas. These authorized projects typically utilize competitive project grants or formula grants.
Examples of targeted assistance programs include:
- Regional Focus: Specific appropriations often exist for geographic areas facing severe structural deficits, such as the U.S.-Mexico border, the Appalachian region, Alaska Native villages, and U.S. territories. These funds are designed to improve public health through critical water infrastructure upgrades.
- Economic Development Focus: The Economic Development Administration (EDA), part of the Department of Commerce, provides grants where water supply infrastructure is a critical component of local economic development and job creation.
- Community Development Assistance: Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds, such as Community Development Block Grants, can be utilized for community development projects, including essential upgrades to drinking water infrastructure and wastewater infrastructure.
B. Application Strategy for Authorized Projects
Securing these specialized funds requires precise alignment with legislative intent. Do not submit generic proposals.
Follow these steps to maximize success:
- Review Authorizing Language: Consult Congress.gov to review the specific statute or appropriation bill that authorized the funding. Determine the exact eligible uses and geographic constraints.
- Demonstrate Alignment: Clearly articulate how the utility’s water projects directly fulfill the mandate of the authorizing legislation (e.g., if the fund targets drought mitigation, emphasize water supply resiliency).
- Leverage Partnerships: Collaborate with regional planning organizations or state agencies that administer funds from the Bureau of Reclamation or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, as these agencies often require state sponsorship for infrastructure projects.
- Confirm Eligibility: Verify that the utility’s service population and infrastructure deficit qualify under the program’s definition of a small or disadvantaged community.
Successful applications demonstrate that the proposed water infrastructure investment serves both local operational needs and the broader federal government objective for regional stability and economic development.
Expert Insight
“The historic federal investment in water infrastructure requires local utilities to navigate complex planning challenges and leverage State Revolving Funds strategically, ensuring the funding successfully reaches disadvantaged communities to address critical needs like lead service line replacement and rural upgrades.” , Water Policy Analyst
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Federal Funding and Strategic Consolidation
What is the primary difference between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) funding for small systems?
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), primarily through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF), focuses heavily on regulatory compliance and mandated public health protections.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development programs emphasize comprehensive community development and economic development in rural areas.
USDA typically provides a higher grant percentage for water infrastructure projects and water supply infrastructure, minimizing the resulting debt burden for small systems.
How does Congress authorize federal funding for water infrastructure projects?
Congress authorizes federal funding for water projects through two main mechanisms.
First, Standing Authorizations provide ongoing authority for formula grant programs like the SRFs administered by the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Second, Direct Project Authorizations are specific approvals required for large civil works and specialized infrastructure projects.
These direct authorizations typically involve the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation, requiring subsequent Annual Appropriations from Congress to execute the work.
Can a small utility utilize Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program (WIFIA) funding?
The Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program (WIFIA) is designed for large-scale infrastructure projects, but small and disadvantaged communities can access this federal funding through aggregation.
Aggregation involves bundling multiple small drinking water infrastructure or wastewater infrastructure projects together to meet the minimum project cost threshold.
Utility managers should consult their state environmental agency regarding intermediary state programs that leverage WIFIA financing to support local systems.
What is the immediate first step for a utility considering consolidation or shared services?
The immediate first step is to commission a preliminary, objective financial and asset management assessment.
This assessment must utilize current spatial data, ideally through Geographic Information Systems (GIS), to quantify the deferred maintenance liability of all existing drinking water infrastructure and wastewater infrastructure assets.
This objective data is essential for negotiating equitable merger terms or defining the scope of a shared services agreement for long-term water supply viability.
